By far the most interesting hand from
this session you’re about to read about was not the quads I flopped, but
perhaps the biggest pot I ever witnessed up close and personal at a 1/2 game. I wasn’t in the hand, although if I was, and
had been the guy with pocket Kings, I’d probably never complain about them
again. (Yeah, right.)
I’m going back to the end of March for
this one; it was actually my last night in town for that particular trip. Early in the session I had a very nice time
having a drink with one of my loyal blog readers, a fellow from the Boston area
I’ll call Bob, because that’s his actual name.
Well, technically, it’s probably Robert but he goes by Bob. Bob had emailed me that he would be out for a
visit and wondered if I would be around.
So he came over to BSC and I took a break from the game and we chatted
for quite some time. Bob didn’t feel
like playing, he’s actually more of a tournament player than a cash game player,
at least when it comes to actual poker rooms.
Bob told me about a couple of home
games he plays in regularly back home (at least one of which consists of
tournaments, not cash games) and mentioned that he actually had Josie and Gary over once to play in them. But the
commute was too much for them to make it a regular thing. I guess he discovered Josie’s blog first and
that got him to mine and whatever other poker blogs he follows. Bob mentioned a couple of my posts that he
particularly enjoyed, which was nice to hear, but I won’t discuss that here because
it would make me sound too egotistical.
Like most of the readers I meet, he
was a heckuva nice guy in addition to having impeccable taste. But we just had
the drink and never played poker together. He’ll be back in the fall and I’m
hoping it’s when I’m there too and maybe this time we can play some poker
together.
Earlier in the session—before I took
the break to chat with Bob—I was dealt pocket 3’s in late position. I was one
of five callers, but no one raised. I
guess you could say the flop hit me. It
was 3-Ace-3. It checked to me, last to
act. Damn, didn’t anyone have an
Ace? I checked too. There was a 9 on the turn and again we all
checked. I suppose I should have thought
about betting there. The 4 on the river
didn’t look like it was gonna help anyone and again it checked to me. I bet a lousy $5 hoping maybe to get a few
callers, if not a raise. It folded to a
guy I had played with many times back when I was playing 2/4 limit. He too had switched over to NL and I’d run
into a few times playing 1/2. Anyway he
called.
Since we were old pals, I said, as I
showed my hand, “Thanks, you paid me off for my quads.” He said he was happy to do it. Maybe because it was only five bucks.
Back at this time, they didn’t have
the cash drawings 24/7 but they did have high hand bonuses. Quads or better got to pick a prize ball
which could be anywhere from $50 to $1,000.
Of course most of the balls had $50 in them. I think there were two (out of 100) that had
the $1,000. Let me put it this way….if I
had drawn the $1,000 prize, you would have heard about this night a lot
earlier. I picked a $50 ball. Still, better than nothing, right?
That was the high point of the session
for a long time. I didn’t win much after
that. My stack was down to $111. Now, there was an Irishman at the table and
he was fairly aggressive. He liked to
straddle and raised a lot of pots preflop.
I figured if I could get a hand against him, I could get some chips.
Earlier I had three-bet him with
pocket Jacks. He tanked for a long time
before he folded Ace-Queen face up. I
was actually kind of surprised he didn’t call me with that. He kept quizzing me as to what I had. “I know you didn’t have Aces. Did you have Kings? Queens?
Ten’s?” Interesting that he didn’t
guess the hand I actually had.
Finally I said, “deuce-7.” He didn’t believe me, surprisingly
enough. Then I said, “Yeah, if I had
deuce-7, I would have shown it.”
This time he raised in front of me
again and I had Ace-King of hearts. Ok,
this was definitely a guy I would three-bet Ace-King against. He had made it $7 so I made it $21.
He tanked again and said to me, “You
did this to me before.” I think that was
probably the reason he called this time.
It was just the two of us. The
flop was 9-6-5. The 9 was a spade, the
other cards were both hearts.
He checked and I shoved for my last
$90. Hey, it was my last night in town
and I figured I had to make one ridiculous bluff. Of course it was just a semi-bluff—even if he
had a big hand I had outs to the nut flush.
I just figured he would likely fold to my aggressive bet and if he didn’t,
I could still catch my flush. It was a bit of an uncharacteristic move for
me. But it was late enough so that I
would just call it a night if I lost and I wasn’t risking that much. Still, I was fairly sure he’d fold.
He tanked for a long time and then
called (he had me covered by a lot). OK,
fine, I need a heart or I’m on my way back to L.A. We didn’t show. The last two cards were lowish, no pair, and
more importantly, no friggin’ hearts.
And so, he just looked at me. I flipped over my hand and said, “Well, I
missed.” I think I actually started to
stand up but he said, “No. You’re good.”
And he tabled his hand….King-Queen of clubs. WTF? He
had called my shove on the flop with just overcards? Yes, that’s what he did. He had no draw, no nothing, just two overcards.
He said he thought I had a low pair. Really?
I three-bet with a low pair? Apparently he hadn’t gotten over the time I
three-bet him with the Jacks. Even if he was right, why risk so much just
trying to hit a pair draw? Weird.
I couldn’t believe it. This was remarkable. Definitely the biggest pot I’d ever won with
Ace-high. Wow. I actually texted my pal Abe that this may
have been the most awesome hand of my poker career.
I didn’t win or lose more than a few
bucks after that, but I’m glad I was still around to watch one of the most
exciting hands I’d ever been at the table for.
This involves three players and I’ll
just refer to them by their seat numbers.
Seat 5 had been at the table for awhile and hadn’t played that many
hands. He had moved over from another
table with over $600. Why would he leave
a table where he had done so well? He
said it was a great table for awhile but that all the action players had left—after
losing money to him, apparently—and had been replaced by a bunch of nits. But he wasn’t getting hands to play since he’d
been at this game.
Seat 2 had been there a long time and
was a bit of an aggro, and his stack had fluctuated quite a bit, but now he had
over $600. Seat 1 was fairly new and had
just won a couple of big pots to get to over $600 as well.
Seat 1 opened the pot for $20, a
rather uncharacteristically large bet, both for the table and for him. Seat 2 and Seat 5 both called, as did another
player. So it was an $80 preflop.
The flop was King-9-5, two
diamonds. Seat 1 led out for $40 or
$50. Seat 2 made it $120. Seat 5 asked for a count of the bet. After getting the amount verified, he paused
and said, “Let’s play for $300.”
Wow. Now this was getting
interesting. The last guy folded
instantly.
Back to Seat 1, who wasted little time
before announcing, “all-in.” Seat 2 tanked for awhile, but eventually he said, “all-in.”
Seat 5 was not happy. He acted like someone who knew he was
beat. But he really couldn’t fold. He
had put in half his stack, maybe a little more, and was committed. I don’t know if he said this before he called
or after the hand was over, but he asked himself why he had bet so much (the
$300). As I said, he called.
No one showed. But the guy in Seat 1 called his buddy over from
another table to see, “You gotta see this pot I’m in….it’s huge.”
The last two cards were
meaningless. Seat 5 had pocket 5’s. Seat 1 had the dreaded
pocket Kings, which were dreaded only to other two guys in the
hand. We all assumed that seat 2 had the
flush draw, right? Or maybe a set of 9’s
(but set over set over set is so rare).
Nope. He flipped over pocket Aces! He did have the Ace of diamonds, but still,
really? Really?
Seat 5 was stunned but took it pretty
well. He was thinking of leaving but
when he saw that Seat 2 was rebuying, he decided to stay. He said he knew he was beat when it came back
to him, but he assumed he was up against a set of Kings and a flush draw. The Aces totally shocked him. And he said to the guy stacking all those
chips—over $1,800, and I confirmed that with the dealer—“I knew you had the set
of Kings when you called your buddy over.”
There were a couple of surprising
things about the hand. First off, Seat 2
didn’t re-raise with his Aces. This was really
amazing because he was probably the most aggro player at the table the whole
time I was there, except for maybe the Irishman. He raised preflop quite frequently, yet this
time he chose to flat a $20 opening bet with Aces. Huh?
And then…..how could he possibly think
his Aces were good on the flop, after Seat 5 made it $300 and Seat 1 shoved
(for slightly more than he had)? Really,
how could he possibly call? He wasn’t
committed. He could have folded and it
only would have cost him $140. A
bargain. He had to know at least one of
the other two players had a set.
The thing is, Seat 5, poor guy, got
screwed by Seat 2’s play. It was really
Seat 2’s fault that Seat 5 was felted.
Seat 2 should have three bet, and then Seat 5 probably folds his pocket
5’s, right? Then it would have been
interesting to see if Seat 1 wanted to get it all in preflop with his
Kings. Ordinarily you’d think so. But maybe he’d be cautious and just call Seat
2’s three-bet because they were playing so deep? Can’t say.
But either way, Seat 5 is probably out
of the hand and then he would have been pissed to see that 5 on the flop—until the
river when Seat 1 showed his set of Kings and he would have realized he had dodged
a bullet.
But there was Seat 2 slow playing his
Aces. Now, the thing is, if he had
raised there, the result for him likely wouldn’t have been any different. The right play would have been for him to
have gotten it all in preflop if he could and he still would have lost all his
chips.
But as it happens, he actually played
it the one way he could have to have saved his stack. By not three-betting, he had the perfect
escape route to avoid losing all his chips when common sense should have told
him he was about to. But he didn’t take
that route and instead crashed and burned.
It’s definitely not a good idea to
just call with Aces if you’re not prepared to fold them when all evidence is
screaming at you that you should.
Oh well, it gave me a good story. As I said at the outset, I’m pretty sure that’s
the biggest pot I ever saw at a table I was at.
I left a little while later. The best hand to write about was going to be
my Ace-high hand, until I saw someone demonstrate how to win a $1,800 pot with
the dreaded pocket Kings.
I'm still liking the AK after last night... :D
ReplyDeleteWaiting for that post of yours when you win the monster pot with Q-10.
Deletehe’s actually more of a tournament player than a cash game player
ReplyDeletelike some of the rest of us.
Yeah, sort of like you, MOJO. Have you ever explained why you prefer tournaments so much to cash? Does it have anything to do with your bridge background?
DeleteWhen I first started playing poker ($3/6 limit), I was afraid of losing money. But, in tournaments, you pay your money and that's all you can lose. Because of this, I became more aggressive in tournaments, and eventually pretty much gave up ca$h games altogether.
DeleteYeah, I get it. The psychology of cash vs tournaments is so different.
DeleteBut....even if you're really good, like you, you can go a long time between cashes, you can play hours and come up empty handed, and you can bust out on a bad beat in the first level.....and then your money's gone in a flash. And you're done playing poker that day...unless you re-enter, and then, well, so much for "that's all you can lose."
So.....there's all these trade offs.
Well, cash and tournaments are two different skill sets, and my style doesn't work as well in cash for whatever reason. Agree about tournaments being hit or miss. If you want to do tournaments, you have to embrace that.
Deleteif it aint broke .dont fix it.
DeleteTrue, MOJO, they are definitely different skill sets, cash & tournaments.
DeleteAs anger says, it works for you, so no need to change.
in other news( rumor ,really) Kate Upton may b pregnant. she would b the ultimate MILF!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
ReplyDeleteTrue...and think about what all that milk she'd be producing would do to those mammaries!
DeleteEXACTLY
DeleteA+ for the poker content.
ReplyDeleteC- for the boobage.
But I live for your blog, Rob ... allows me some vicarious poker from across the pond until the next time I can get to Vegas. Unfortunately, though, looks like my next international trip is back to Indonesia. Poker is not real popular there.
But at least I can progress our Tit Bitz franchise contract for the US market...
Thanks, DWP,
DeleteWow, so anger doesn't comment on the boobage but you do? Are you taking over for him.
Looking forward to a report on the Tit Bitz franchise, I can't imagine that it will go tits up.
Yeah, actually, I tried to find a more zaftig lady riding a donkey, but sadly, Kendall Jenner was the best I could do.
I AM SLIPPING SIR. there is no excuse
DeleteOK, I'm in a good mood, so I'll let you off with a warning this time.
Deletelol thx. i was trying to figure out what the pic had to do with the post?
DeleteWell, you know what.....I'm actually gonna have a prize available that I can give away in contest, and I think I'm gonna make the contest, guess what the picture has to do with the blog post. Unless I can come up with something better.
DeleteBut I won't do it for this one. It's a picture of a donkey (the girl is just for exploitation purposes) and it follows the story of the guy who played his pocket Aces like a total donkey.
OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOH i c what u did there
DeleteWow, I don't know which sentence is more true:
DeleteI don't know.
I don't care.
so not a fan of the show full house???????????
DeleteNope. Never paid any attention to it. The only Full House I like is when I get one in poker.
DeleteThe last comment was me. Not sure why ht posts anonymously when I choose Google.
ReplyDeleteSorry I couldn't join you on Saturday. You were unfortunately trumped by a 4yo birthday party..
No problem, Dave, Would have been nice, tho.
DeleteAnyway, I don't understand your comment. There isn't an "anonymous" comment in this thread? Did it get lost? What comment are you referring to you that came thru as anonymous?