This past Friday night, and into
Saturday morning, I was riveted to the TV, watching poker. Scott Davies
was playing for a bracelet. Not just any
ol’ bracelet. He was playing for the
Main Event bracelet at the WSOP- APAC in Australia. In other words, it was a
big effing deal.
I’ve mentioned before, I don’t
actually watch that much televised poker.
But I was excited to make an exception for this event, in order to cheer
for Scott and see if he could get his very first WSOP bracelet.
Why did I care? Well, for over four years now, Scott has been
blogging about his adventures as a professional poker player on AVP (now PokerAtlas). He started long before I started blogging,
and before I started working for AVP. In
fact, the title of his blog is called, “My Quest for a WSOP Bracelet.” You can find his blog here.
So I’ve been following his adventures
and his quest, his highs and lows, for all this time. He’s practically family! If my memory is accurate, I only briefly met
Scott one time, last year during the WSOP in Vegas (see here).
When I learned that Scott had made the
final table at the Main Event down under, and that the final table was going to
be televised on ESPN live here in the US at 10PM Friday night, PST, I knew I
had to watch and see if Scott could do it.
He came into the final table with the second most chips, so it was
certainly doable.
Across the twitterverse, I saw all
kinds of encouragement directed at Scott.
Some of these folks no-doubt knew Scott from his AVP blog. Not sure how the others knew him, but
apparently everyone who knows him or knows of him likes him; that’s the kind of
guy he is.
In Vegas, a few of his friends
organized a viewing party to watch the telecast together: AlaskaGal,
Stump, Michelle,
all names you’ve seen on my blog in the past.
But since I wasn’t in Vegas, I had to do the next best thing.
Friends and followers of Scott from
all over organized a Facebook chat group, just so we could all watch the final
table together and comment about it in real time. Isn’t the internet cool? I hope I don’t leave anyone out, but on the
group chat were Vook, Nick,
John, Jess,
Benton, Dwayne,
Dan (sorry, don’t have a link for him).
Oh yes, Scott’s wife, Liezl, was also part of the chat. She was home in Canada, watching on TV like
the rest of us.
And it was the chat that made it extra
special. All of us, chiming in from
around the country, sharing our thoughts, our good wishes, it was just a total
blast. And keep in mind, for those of
our group who live on the east coast, this started at 1AM and didn’t finish
until after 5AM! They were all troopers.
One logistics problem was that, when
you televise poker “live” and you show the audience the hole cards, you have to
do it on a delay (so that a player can’t have an opponent’s hole cards signaled
to him). We all took a vow not to look
at twitter or any other source that would reveal the results prematurely. Even Liezl agreed…..insisting that Scott not
tell her anything when he called her during the breaks. Honestly, I have a hard time believing she
didn’t get real updates during those conversations (or that she didn’t check Twitter
for current updates), but hey, I’ll go along with it. J
It was so exciting watching Scott go
for the bracelet, and chatting with all his friends and fans at the same time,
that I wasn’t even tired. I had no
trouble staying awake, even tho this went on well past the time I normally
retire when I’m home in LA.
At the start of the 6-handed table ,
the biggest stack belonged to Jack Salter, but after awhile, Frank Kassela took
the chip lead (moving Scott down to third, I believe) and started bullying the
table around. He went on quite a run.
Meanwhile, Scott was card dead and hardly played any hands.
But to show you how fast things can
turn around in tournament poker, Kassela went from chip leader to busto in the
span of just two hands! First, he had
the misfortune of seeing Ace-King when Scott finally woke up with a hand….a big
hand. Pocket Aces, to be precise. They got it all in and Scott’s Aces held (I
believe there was some Hollywooding on Scott’s part before he put all his chips
in the middle). Suddenly, Scott was the
chip leader.
The very next hand, Kassela was dealt
Ace-Queen, and guess what? Salter woke
up with the Aces this time. Again they
were all in, and again, the Aces held.
Bye, bye Kassela. From the
penthouse to the outhouse in two hands.
The rest of the players were soon
eliminated (actually, Kassela went out 5th; the lone woman at the
final table, Ang Italiano, was the first to bust) and it was heads up between
Scott and Salter.
Scott had a small chip lead. I’m not sure, but I think Salter may have
jumped slightly ahead once or twice, but it was usually Scott in the lead, but
never by more than 60% to 40%.
When it was heads up, things got real
interesting, thanks especially to the commentary by noted pro Antonio Esfandiari. The few times previously I’ve heard
Esfandiari doing poker commentary, I’ve always enjoyed him. He is not only insightful, but he’s witty and
charming and presents a winning personality.
I think he’s the best poker “color-man.”
Or at least I did until he started his
commentary on the heads-up match.
Antonio didn’t like Scott’s play at
all. He didn’t like his heads-up
style. He clearly didn’t think Scott was
aggressive enough. He even said that he
didn’t think Scott had a lot of experience heads-up.
He was only the “guest” commentator,
but really, he should have done some research.
Those of us in the Facebook chat group
all knew (or soon learned) that Scott is actually a heads-up specialist. He might have checked Scott’s cashes from
this year’s WSOP. Scott finished fourth
in the $10K heads-up event.
Antonio predicted immediately that
Salter would win the bracelet; he made it clear that he felt Scott was
overmatched, and kept praising Salter (and dissing Scott) even as his stack was
shrinking. It was kind of funny. Except that it was really annoying to our
little chat group of Scott’s fans. Antonio
may have lost some fans this night. Meanwhile, Liezl was telling us that Scott was
doing exactly what he wanted to do, that this was his specialty, and that he
was going to win. She laughed off
Antonio’s digs at her husband and expressed total confidence in Scott.
To be fair to Antonio, he has his own
view of how heads-up should be played, and that’s what he was there for, to
give the viewer his expert opinion. But
you know, there’s more than one style that can be successful in poker and
Antonio didn’t seem to be willing to consider that. If you ask for advice on how to play a
specific hand of five different pros, the first thing they will say to you is,
“It depends.” Then the five of them will
give you at least seven different answers.
We didn’t see it until after the event
was over (on TV, that is), but we later learned that another top pro, Phil Hellmuth,
had tweeted out that he disagreed with Antonio and that he actually loved
Scott’s style and strategy.
Anyway, Antonio’s disagreeable
comments probably made us pull even harder for Scott, if that was possible,
just so we could all kind of universally say to Antonio, “Take that!” Or “Nyah, nyah, nyah, nyah.” Or even, “Where’s your main event bracelet,
Antonio?”
Heads-up play went on for a
(seemingly) long time without a lot of dramatic hands. Scott kept chipping up, but there were no
monster pots or monster hands. It was
after 2AM on the west coast, and it was beginning to look like I’d see the
sunrise before this thing would be over.
There were a couple of hands that had
us all going crazy on the chat. On one,
I think Scott had top pair, but there were two 4’s on the board and Salter had
one in his hand. Scott was beat, but it
was hard to put Salter on a 4 and Scott could have easily thought he had the
best hand. Facing a river bet, Scott
tanked for a long time. The chat room
was going crazy, “Fold!” “Lay it down!” Finally, Scott did indeed fold and we all
cheered.
The flip side was when Scott had a
Jack in his hand and there were two Jacks on the board. But the board was scary. Salter had a straight draw, and on the river,
he missed. But the river put a third
diamond on the board. Scott’s trip Jacks
looked eminently beatable. But Salter
had absolutely nothing. He led out with a
huge overbet, bigger than the pot. Scott
went into the tank for a long, long time.
Then the weirdest thing happened. As we were all shouting in the chat room,
“Call, call, call!” the TD came over and told Scott that he had one minute to
act; the clock had been called. But no
one, and I mean no one, had heard Salter call for the clock. Even the commentators were surprised, they
hadn’t heard it either. We wondered if
it was possible that the TD did it himself?
Pretty sure that isn’t allowed.
Apparently Salter must have whispered it, or perhaps had somehow
signaled to the TD non-verbally.
However, Scott couldn’t hear us
shouting to call (especially since, by the time we saw it on TV, it had
happened half an hour earlier). And as
the clock was counting down, he folded.
Damn it!
The commentators, Antonio and Norman Chad,
had a field day with this. They both
proclaimed that, even tho Scott still was the chip leader, this was the
“turning point” of the match. They
clearly expected Salter to go on from there and start taking Scott’s chips as
if he was taking candy from a baby.
Honestly, they way they were talking, Scott may have well as just thrown
in the towel. Even before this, they were saying that Salter was clearly
outplaying Scott, which was absurd. Scott was the one who was slowly but
steadily building up his stack. It would have been funny if we weren’t all
pulling so hard for Scott.
I assume at the break that Scott
learned that he had been bluffed there, but that’s the difference between
successful pros and amateurs. They can
deal with that without going on tilt.
Scott kept playing his steady game—the one Antonio didn’t like—and built
his chip lead back up.
At some point, Antonio finally
realized that Scott was playing well, and started praising his moves a bit. Then finally, just when it looked like
there’d never be a truly game-changing hand, it happened. Scott had pocket 6’s and Salter had Queen-10
(yes, Coach, the “evil
hand”). I believe Scott three-bet with
his 6’s.
The flop came 10-10-6.
Bingo!
Scott had flopped a full house, and
Salter “only” flopped trip 10’s. On the
turn there was some back and forth betting, Salter finally announced “all-in”
and Scott insta-called. He had Salter
covered. The river was a blank and our pal Scott had his first WSOP
bracelet—and a Main Event bracelet at that.
Out little chat group was ecstatic, to
say the least. Liezl told us that Scott
had actually called her with the news while she was watching the final hand on
TV (I guess Scott was tied up with interviews and such).
It was freaking awesome.
Side note: I’m pretty sure that in the entire 4+ hours
of poker, we never saw anyone get dealt the dreaded pocket Kings, for whatever that’s
worth.
To be fair to Antonio, he did say, "Just because I don't like his limping on the button, doesn't mean he isn't playing pretty good." Antonio's professional opinion was that Scott should had been more aggressive in some spots.
ReplyDeleteScott played well and deserved the win. He has worked hard for years to get to this position to win a bracelet. He did it and many of us are very proud of him. GG Scott!
Thanks, Anony.....I did say the Antonio had changed his tune after awhile and noted that Scott was playing well. I didn't recall the specific quote you have there.
DeleteBut in a way, Antonio's comments make Scott's win all the sweeter.
I was following all this on twitter, during the early mornings without any TV. ESPN (in many guises) comes and goes in the UK, as it's up against Sky (Fox). Great job by Scott, and the haters can say what they want. It won't change the result.
ReplyDeleteThanks, Ben. I think it would be unfair to characterize Antonio as a hater. He was just really convinced that his way to play heads up was the right way.
DeleteI was talking about others as well in the commentary team. In fact this happens a lot in sports commentary in general , when the unknown comes up against the establishment. However Antonio has posted a well done tweet to Scott, so he's off the hook ! :)
DeleteWell, haters gonna hate....
DeleteGreat post Rob - but surely you could have figured a way to sneak some boobage in there??
ReplyDeleteI have been living in Hong Kong for 3 weeks now, but haven't yet had time to venture over to Macau and check out the poker. Been travelling on business every week - mostly to Indonesia (negotiating our Tit Bitz franchise) and Taiwan.
I'm planning November 1/2 for a Macau trip and will report back.
D
Thanks, DWP. Good luck in Macau. I'll bet those games are totally insane.
DeleteIn fact, I searched for and wide for a pic of Scott topless, but I couldn't find one.
Rob,
ReplyDeleteHaving railed Scott at the heads up event here in Vegas, I was actually surprised how passively he was playing the button heads up. My guess was that since Salter was expected to be uber-aggressive, Scott was trying a bit of trapping to counter that. Or that Scott was playing small ball because they were both so deep. Still, I was still surprised that he didn't change gears on the button a bit sooner.
Dave (DapPoker)
Thanks, Dave! Great to have you comment here.
DeleteThat's interesting about Scott's play, I'd never seen him play for so I assumed that was his normal play. But Scott's wife did indicate that what he was doing was all part of his plan and his normal play. You're right tho, I assume those heads up matches had shorter stacks, so that might have had something to do with it.
Whatever, it sure as hell worked (as did the trick of flopping a boat when your opponent flops trips--I'd like to add that to my game!)