Well, maybe just a tad more than a
little bit.
My most recent session in Ventura
wasn't going so well. Another session
where I was totally card dead. Up to
this point I had had a total of two pocket pairs. Both times it was pocket 7's. BTW, is it just me or does it seem like
whenever you get so few pocket pairs that you notice how few it is, they always
seem to be the same pocket pair? Anyway,
those two hands didn't pan out. I never
saw Ace-King or Ace-Queen or any big cards where I could play them. No suited connectors (well, I think I might
have gotten 3-2 suited under-the-gun once).
I did manage to win a very small pot
early when I was in the big blind and no one raised. My King-9 caught a 9-2-2 flop. I bet something and didn't get a call, even
tho six of us saw that flop.
But that was it.
So after a several hours, I was about
ready to call it a day. The table at my
2/3 game had started off fairly juicy, with a few aggros putting chips into
play. I never had anything to battle
them with. Then the aggros left and the
game got dull. A lot of chopping the
blinds. We were short for awhile but
another game broke and we got a player from that table.
That new player had a short stack,
around $55-$60. For the first few hands,
he shoved every time he entered a pot.
After a few times doing this, he managed to get enough chips so he
started playing more seriously. He got
his stack close to $100 and then up over $100 when this hand happened.
I had decided to play no more than another
two orbits after posting my blinds. And
on the button I looked down at a couple of Aces. Finally a pocket pair. And it wasn't any damn 7's, either.
The fellow I just mentioned who came
to the table shoving his short stack was under-the-gun, and raised to $15. By
now his stack was over $100, but not much over.
After a few folds another guy called the $15. His stack was over $300. It came to me, and I was sitting behind
around $220 at this point (down from my $300 buy-in). I made it $60, which I thought was the right
size. My assumption was the initial raiser
didn't have enough to call, he'd either shove or fold. And my money was on shoving. Since he had stopped open-shoving, it didn't
appear to me that he was opening light.
I couldn't imagine him having a hand good enough to raise with that he
would let go easily, especially since he had demonstrated a willingness to put
his chips in play.
The guy on my left, the small blind,
had me covered at least three times over
He had been one of the aggros when the other aggros were there, but once
the others left he had been fairly quiet.
So I was a bit surprised when he cold called a $60 from the tightest
player at the table.
Now it was back to the initial raiser,
who did what I expected and shoved. The
other guy folded instantly. It was back
to me. I asked for a count of the shove, and it was $111. I thought that was enough for me to be able
to raise, but I have to say, I've seen some weird rules interpretations in this
room (really all CA card rooms) so I asked if I could raise. The dealer did some math and told me I could
indeed raise. No one at the table
objected. In fact, the guy behind me,
who had called me, actually said "yes" to my question before the
dealer did. Hmm….maybe he wanted me to
raise? Did he have Kings perhaps (or, a
long shot, the other two Aces?)
Anyone think I should have just
flatted there? It didn't make sense to
me. And I couldn't really raise without
shoving. "All-in," I announced.
The guy on my left spent a good bit of
time in the tank. Finally he said,
"I know you've got me beat," and reluctantly folded. He did, however, show his hand. Pocket 10's. I was thinking his initial call
of my $60 kind of sucked, but what do I know?
I was grateful for the dead money.
The dealer put out the flop. It was Jack-high, two fairly low cards. At which point the other guy flipped over his
hand. Two Jacks. Yuck.
Fortunately I didn't have much time to
dwell on my misfortune because the dealer quickly put out the turn card, which
was a beautiful, gorgeous, smokin' hot Ace.
The river card was something or other.
I had started to turn my hand over at the sight of the Ace but I don't
think I beat the dealer to putting out the river card. Anyway, the guy with the Jacks groaned, I
said something like "Gee,"—you
know to indicate that I was at least acknowledging my good fortune (after his
initial good fortune).
Then the guy said, "One more Jack…..jackpot." Huh?
Then I realized what he meant.
"And you would have had the bigger share, with the losing
hand." Yes indeed. The minimum hand
needed to be beaten to qualify for the bad beat jackpot here (and in the other
CA rooms I've played in) is Aces full of Jacks. Had he caught his one-outer to
taken the pot from me, I would have been very happy. The BBJ was worth $15K. So I would have gotten a tasty $7,500. He would have gotten $3,750. and the rest of
the table would have split the rest.
Ordinarily I wouldn't even mention it,
but this was probably the closest I've ever come to actually hitting a BBJ. And
it was all set up for it too. All that
was missing was the case Jack. Hey, it
was only a 1-in-42 chance (counting the fact that we'd seen two 10's in
addition to our own hands. That's a
better chance than I usually have, right?
Oh well, winning the pot with a little
bit o' luck and turning a losing session into a profitable one would have to
do.
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
ReplyDelete