Have you ever had a poker session
where you came away feeling you got killed?
Of course you have. You just had
one of those sessions where everything went wrong, you seemed to end up with
the second best hand time and time again.
We all know how expensive that can be.
Or maybe it was just one hand. You were doing fine, maybe showing a nice
profit, and you had the misfortune of having your dreaded pocket Kings run into pocket Aces, held by the only player at
the table with a bigger stack than yours.
You could say you got killed.
But getting “killed” at a poker table
takes on a whole new meaning in the new novel by Christopher Parks I just read,
Death Raise..
The book is a thriller with a very prevalent
poker theme. It seems 10 people from
around the country have been won an all expenses paid vacation to play in a
very exclusive poker tournament being held on a remote island in a beautiful
mansion somewhere in the Atlantic.
But the players obviously didn’t read
the fine print when they signed up. After
the first round of the tournament, the winner of that first round is handed a
gun, and he is given three seconds to kill one of the other nine players. If he fails to shoot one of his fellow poker
players, he himself will be shot to death.
Kind of brings a whole new meaning to
the phrase “shootout tournament,” doesn’t it?
It is explained to them that this will
happen every day until there is only one survivor. Yikes!
Of course, there’s no escape from the island, though that doesn’t stop
the remaining players from exploring avenues of escape.
So the novel is not really a “who done
it?” but more of a “who is going to be done-in next?” And of course, then, the inevitable question
of “why that person?”
Another way to look at would be to say
it’s a cross between Agatha Christie’s classic “And Then There Were None” and
the TV show Survivor. Only this is really
the ultimate game of Survivor, isn’t it?
You don’t get voted off the island.
You get voted off this mortal coil.
High Stakes Poker? Yes, indeed, the highest stakes possible.
The book is a whole lot of fun. The characters are forced to make (very
temporary) alliances and of course, there are double-deals, triple-deals,
broken deals, back-biting, double-crosses, etc.
Anything to survive.
All of the ten players had previously
won some sort of poker tournament somewhere, so it is, at least on the surface,
a fair fight. Or at least they all
conceivable have a chance to win. None
of them appear to be what you would likely call a professional poker player.
In fact, one of them mostly works as a
Vegas stripper. If I may be so bold, I
would suggest to the author that there might very well be another novel (a
prequel, if you will) in the story of a stripper winning a Vegas poker
tournament. I’m guessing she used the Jennifer Tilly effect to full advantage.
There are two other female players in
addition to the stripper. All of the
women are at least tempted to use their feminine wiles to their advantage. Which means, of course, that in addition to
the “fun” of a nightly killing, there’s some sex in the story. All the players are forced to use all their
skills, talents and intellectual abilities to figure out how to survive.
And of course, that means winning each
night’s round of poker. Now, the poker
is very much secondary here to the thrilling plot and all the deal-making and
the attempts to find a weak spot in their captors’ well-designed prison. The fun is in the plot, the characters, the
twists and turns. You never know who’s
going to win each day, and who they will pick to kill, or why.
There’s also an intriguing sub-plot
that takes place away from the island.
How that plot figures into the main one (and trying to figure that out)
is another fun element to the whole story.
The poker itself is not really the
reason to read this entertaining book.
It could really be any game, any kind of contest that involves both luck
and skill. By using poker though, it is
easy to explain how the mysterious powers that be would know that all their
contestants had had poker success. In
the book’s universe, the players are all no doubt all listed on Hendon Mob.
But in notes at the end of the book,
the author indicates he got the idea for the book when he was the chip leader
in a poker tournament in Atlantic City.
Wow, that must have been some poker tournament. Actually, he said he was the chip leader at
the final table but finished 7th (and no doubt is still pissed about
that). I guess that would explain why he
would want to shoot all the other players!
So the poker itself is just
background. You will get no great
insights to the game from reading the book.
In fact, a lot of the action as described is rather bizarre and
inexplicable. Some of that turns out to
be due to the fact that the players are purposely playing to help other
players, as part of their deals (yes, there’s definitely some collusion going
on). Other times it’s harder to justify.
No matter, that’s not the point of the
book. The fun is in the main story, the
characters, the alliances, the double-crosses, and the all the action that
ensues as a result. The book definitely
works as a thriller.
For a fun, quick read, I do recommend
Death Raise, whether you play poker or not.
NO WONDER you're not writing longer posts - you're reading novels... #disappointed
ReplyDeleteYou complain when my posts are too long, then you complain when they're too short. One of these days, Goldilocks, I'll get it just right for you.
DeleteGoldilocks. Okay... ;)
DeleteI'm going to have to read this but....uh....
ReplyDeleteI'm a bit annoyed as for the past few years I've been composing (in my head) a poker game where the winner is the only one who survives....
I'll still go ahead with mine at some point. I'm sure the quality will be a lot less and I'll be considered a rip-off (which, is more a rip-off of The Long Walk than this, but none-the-less true) but whatever.
Bastard
Yeah, well, knowing you Serge, I'm sure yours will be a lot more twisted than this and no one will see it as a rip-off.
DeleteRob, you know your blog is unsurpassed in quality & quantity. Congrats, always entertaining. I want to comment in TBC and VJ blogs, but they do not accept anonymous comments, and i'm not familiar with how to set up the other options. So, here goes, if you allow it. Comment for VJ: are you hitting that? ie-Mike. and for TBC: Taking bets on how long before TBC is eating out of dumpsters, given continued "dem good machines" play.
ReplyDeleteGeez. Came very close to not approving this. I was torn because of the praise you made about my blog--which you are clearly dead on about--and the cheap shot you took at Tony. You are welcome to go on his own blog and say anything you want directly.
DeleteI suggest you set up a limited blogger profile....it shouldn't take more than a minute or tow, you can come up with any fake name you want. You can probably even use something like Anonymous1, or some number.
I assumed the praise would do the trick. Regardless i commend your literary "cajones", for allowing my remarks.
Deletecheers.mate