This is the follow-up to my previous
post (see here) wherein I will tell
you what happened with the hand I posted there.
You must absolutely read that post first before reading this one. And, you really should read all the comments you
good folks left there too, before proceeding.
I got a lot of great comments and I
want to thank you all for your input. Because
I didn’t want to give anything away, I didn’t respond to the comments
individually like I usually do. But I do
thank all of you who took the time to give me feedback.
Those comments were almost unanimous in telling me the right
move was to fold. Now, since I’ve always
considered myself a nit, you all must be wondering why I would post a hand like
that and ask for feedback. Surely I
folded. I bet you might have thought I
folded, only to see my flush hit, and this I was posting the hand to kvetch about this monster
pot I should have won.
In fact, Lightning even suggested that in his comment, although he added the kicker that someone
boated on the river and I would have lost anyway.
But it turns out, I guess I can no
longer consider myself a nit.
Just a donkey.
I thought long and hard. I couldn’t see just calling. The guy behind me could easily re-raise
anyway, and I sure didn’t like the idea of putting $116 in the pot only to fold
to a re-raise. Besides, if I did call,
and it wasn’t re-raised, what would happen if my flush hit? Maybe the others would be reluctant to put
more chips in the pot with a third club on the board.
I tried to do some quick calculations
if we got it all-in right then. The rule
of two and four gave me 36% equity, roughly. And if everyone called, that would
be sufficient. But that doesn’t take
into account redraws. I figured I was up
against a set—or two—and/or maybe two pair.
So yes, I could hit my flush and still lose. Maybe I was up against a
smaller flush draw, that would be nice.
Except in that case it meant that two of my outs were not available, reducing my chances
of hitting the flush and no longer making the play priced right.
And there was no guarantee everyone
would call. Of course, if everyone folded to a shove, that would be just fine,
I’d gladly take the pot as is. But that
was a long-shot. OTOH, maybe just the player
who would have beaten me would fold (also unlikely).
Then I started having flashbacks to
previous hands. The truth is, in similar
situations, making a big bet or a big raise with just a draw has never worked out
for me, I never hit the draw, at least as far as I can remember. I’m talking about cash games; it has worked
when I’m desperate in tournaments.
And then for a second I recalled a big
pot I was a part of some time ago, when someone was in a similar situation that
I was here. That story is here, but briefly, I flopped Broadway, and
a guy with a small flush draw raised huge, another guy called, we got it all in
preflop. And of course the guy with the
baby flush draw hit it on the river and I lost a huge three-way pot. It was an $800+ pot and it is the biggest pot
I was ever a part of.
Until now.
So after all that tanking, I swear I
was just about to fold when I suddenly heard myself say, “all-in.”
Left wasted very little time,
announcing “all-in.”
Lady took a long, long time. She had the smallest stack, and I figured
that should make it fairly easy for her.
If she won the main pot, she’d be looking at a pure quadruple up, not
bad for a stack that was under $150. Of
course, I didn’t know what her hand was.
If she had a flush draw, for instance, it would surely not be for the
nut flush, and it might be easy to think she could catch her flush and still
lose.
She asked for time, apologized for
taking so long, asked for more time—no one called clock on her—apologized again…..and
finally called.
Right, the guy who had made it $116
took a little bit of time. He shook his
head, groaned, sighed….and finally said, “All right. All-in.”
Then, before the dealer could put out the turn card, he added, “I have
to dodge a lot of bullets.”
None of us showed our hands. So I just prayed for a club, and instead I
saw a red card hit the board. Worse, it
was Ace, pairing the board. I kind of
felt I was dead at that point—surely someone had a set that had just boated
up—but no one reacted. Usually in that
situation, even if the person who caught the boat doesn’t show, he or she gives
off some tell that he or she really, really liked the card.
So I thought maybe it still mattered
if a club hit the river. But no, it was
another red card, a low to medium one, I can’t remember, and all I had was
King-high. I was reasonably certain that
wasn’t any good.
I didn’t flip my hand over, the other
three did. Left had pocket 5’s, so yes,
that Ace on the turn gave him a full house.
Lady turned over pocket 4’s, so she had a gutshot to the wheel. Well, that explains why she didn’t snap-call.
And then there was Left, who had the
best hand on the flop. Yes folks, he was
playing the Grump, the mighty
deuce-four, aka, the most powerful hand in poker. He flopped
the wheel, but it didn’t hold up. The
boat crushed him. I ask you, how could
deuce-four fail like that?
But it did. Didn’t matter to me though, I didn’t care who
I lost to, I just cared that I lost.
Left took the entire pot with his
boat. It was indeed a huge pot…..over
$1,000. I’ll bet he enjoyed every minute
of stacking those chips! I really wasn’t
bothered that much by losing the $300.
But I couldn’t stop thinking of the $1,000 I could have won there. So it was now definitely the biggest pot in a
cash game I’d ever been a part of.
Here’s the thing, as the day progressed,
I started thinking that, as unhappy as I was about losing that hand, I believed
I would have felt worse if I had folded and it turned out my hand would hit and
won that big pot. To me, that would have
been worse than losing the $300.
And that kind of scares me.
And that's why I posted the hand and encouraged comments. I was more upset about missing out on the pot than I was about making the bad play. So, as I suspected, I would get hammered in the comments for my play there, and I am hoping that all the feedback I got telling me what a bad play I made will help me in the future in similar situations.
So thanks for helping me with those comments. And of course, you are more than welcomed to comment back on this thread and let me know what a donkey I am. Let me have it.
And that's why I posted the hand and encouraged comments. I was more upset about missing out on the pot than I was about making the bad play. So, as I suspected, I would get hammered in the comments for my play there, and I am hoping that all the feedback I got telling me what a bad play I made will help me in the future in similar situations.
So thanks for helping me with those comments. And of course, you are more than welcomed to comment back on this thread and let me know what a donkey I am. Let me have it.
Anyway, as I suggested I would last
time, I did indeed re-buy for another $300 and carried on. The game I was originally at, where the $1K
pot happened, actually broke and I moved to another table. I only want to discuss one other hand from
this day, because I got an interesting criticism of my play.
I had King-Queen of diamonds and
raised to $12; there were two callers.
The guy on my immediate left was straddling my big blind and a bit of
aggro. The flop came Jack-10-2,
rainbow. I c-bet $20, the guy next to me
called, the other guy folded.
An Ace hit the turn, giving me
Broadway on a board where no flush was possible. I had started the hand a little bit under
$300, I bet $55. My opponent thought for
quite a bit, but then called.
A damn King hit the river. I still had the nuts, but now a measly Queen
would chop the pot with me. I shrugged
and moved all-in. Not sure why I didn’t
bet less, I think I knew instinctively it didn’t matter. He snapped called, I flipped my hand and
said, “You have a Queen?”
Yep?
He turned over the evil hand, as Coach calls it, Queen-10. Offsuit. Yes, I got counterfeited.
But another player, never in the hand,
piped up. He said, “Of course he has a
Queen. He’s not calling if he doesn’t have a Queen. If you shove on the turn, he folds.” The guy with Q-10 agreed. “True, I don’t call there.” Well yes, that’s true. Duh.
But did I make a bad play? I don’t think so, do you? Yeah, I could have bet a lot bigger and
gotten a fold on the turn. Probably less
than a shove (this guy had me covered).
But I gave him bad odds to call with his gutshot (and still bad even if
he thought he had outs with the Queen or the 10), and he called. Isn’t that the way it’s supposed to
work? You give someone bad odds to call,
but you want them to call—for value.
Sometimes they make a bad call and they catch their card. In his case, he had four outs to chop the
pot. He had no shot of winning it
outright. And so if he knew what I had,
he didn’t just make a bad call, he made a horrible one.
But this guy thought I made a bad play
by not shoving the turn?
I didn’t say anything, I certainly
wasn’t about to explain poker to this guy (who seemed like an experienced
player). I just found it odd. And a bit annoying. But the real annoying part was chopping the
pot I should have won.
Anyway, a few observations about my
second visit to Player’s Casino. Angerisagift will be happy to learn that I
checked, and they do have Mountain Dew!
But not diet MD, or any other variation.
They also have Diet Dr. Pepper, which surprised me and which I’ll have
to remember to ask for next time. They
even have Orange Crush.
The other thing was, they were a lot
less busy than the Saturday before. Much
more parking, few tables going when I got there, more tables not in use. They opened a third 2/3 game just as our game
was starting to lose players, so we ended up being short-handed for awhile, and
as I noted, our game eventually broke.
When three of us wanted to continue, we all went to the same table and
there was still one empty seat. So that
was a big difference from last week. And I had gotten there about the same time
as the week before.
Not sure how to explain the difference. The weather was a lot nicer this time, did
people want to do outdoorsy things instead of staying inside playing
poker? The other thought I had was that
this was the Saturday of the big fight up in Vegas, plus the Kentucky Derby, so
maybe some of the regs were up in Vegas for that?
Oh and one more thing. I did learn
that they do allow the normal, Vegas-style, chopping of the blinds. No house fee taken out like at the Bike. I chopped the blinds twice myself. One time I had pocket Jacks, exposed them and
said, “I didn’t want to play these anyway.”
Anyway, I ended up losing a bit over
$300. Could never get any traction after
the big miss. But I still really like
the room, and for sure I will be there again in the not too distant future.
"And then there was Left, who had the best hand on the flop. Yes folks, he was playing the Grump, the mighty deuce-four, aka, the most powerful hand in poker. He flopped the wheel, but it didn’t hold up. The boat crushed him."
ReplyDeleteI've always suspected that you lie a lot in these little stories of yours. Now I KNOW it.
I know, I know....but it's true Grump. Even the mighty deuce-four can't win 'em all.
DeleteI'm certainly not gonna call you a donkey Rob. Like I said before, I probably would have gone ahead and shoved as well. Like you said, missing a big pot by folding can oftentimes feel even worse than staying in and losing a big pot.
ReplyDeleteAnd, I appreciate that you share great stories about both when you win *and* lose. Too many poker bloggers IMHO have turned their sites into giant brag boards. I learn much more from people who are willing to tell me what they did wrong, rather than gloat about how they always do everything right. Thanks. :-)
Thanks, Steve. I actually find it helpful to write about hands or sessions where I lost and where I played less than optimally. Just thinking about them enough to put them into words is somewhat educational, and the feedback I get about how I screwed up is really helpful.
DeleteI don't have illusions that I'm a great poker player, so no reason not to be honest.
Poker is tough.
on the nut flush hand....if the $300 doesn't mean more than missing out on a big pot.....then shove away. If you look at poker as a residual source of income...and want to make correct plays leaving emotion out of it.....then you have to fold the hand.
ReplyDeleteon the KQ hand....you put in a value bet that got called....there is about $80 in the pot and you bet $55....so he has to call $55 in a $135 pot...with 3 outs (6%) with one pull of the deck....he is getting 2 1/2 to 1 and he is 17 to 1! That my friend is a profitable situation....if you shove the turn you don't get that $55...I think you played it perfectly...unless of course you had a read he would call more with his pair and gutshot
Thanks, bill, appreciate the feedback.
DeleteI did feel that my play on the KQ was pretty standard so the comment surprised me. I mean, yes, you could shove preflop with Aces everytime to reduce the number of times you get them cracked, but that wouldn't be very profitable.
Oh, and I don't think he would have called much more. He tanked for a long time as it was. He clearly wasn't doing the math, so I guess he was looking into the future and trying to convince himself that he was about to get lucky. Still, all that got him was half the pot.
DeleteThe KQ hand you played fine. You have the nuts on the turn and you value bet $55. He foolishly calls you and gets lucky on the river.
ReplyDeleteThanks, Nappy. That's what I thought, that's what the math told me, but it was just a strange comment to get, especially since the guy seemed like an experienced player.
DeleteMissing out on a big pot? At the time you went all in, the prospects for the pot reaching $1,000 seemed pretty slim. Is the "missing out on a big pot" a bit of an ex-post rationalization?
ReplyDeleteAbsolutely and I thought I made that clear. It was seeing the guy to my left stacking all those chips, and counting them past $1K, that had me thinking, "Why couldn't that have been me?"
DeleteI never brought up the subject but....did he make a bad call? If he knew there was a made straight already, did he have the right odds to draw for his boat?
I never had a claim on that pot, it's true. But you know, on the turn he had 7 outs to beat that straight and I had 9. Of course, if he hadn't filled up on the turn, he would have had 10 outs on the river.
The KQ hand- I like your sizing on flop and turn but I'm not a fan of the river shove. What are you trying to accomplish by shoving River? The only hand that calls is a queen for a chop. You're much better off betting $50 on the river and hoping he calls you with two pair or something like that. You got unlucky but don't miss out on a spot to pick up value in case he doesn't have a queen.
ReplyDelete-Benton
Thanks Benton, appreciate your input.
DeleteI said in the post I dunno why I bet so big, I think it was just frustration from seeing that I was likely counterfeited and I was sure it was gonna be a chop anyway.
That said, I feel that in most cases, I tend to bet too little, not too much when I have the stone cold nuts. I never get it right.
However, my shove was just a little bit over the size of the pot, so I don't think it was that absurd.
Sucks that the evil hand works both ways... I have no problem with the way you played the hand. You want the 4-outer to call on the turn with only the river to come. Lots of people bluff the river with shoves, so I don't mind that either. Glad you found another poker option in your area...
ReplyDeleteThanks, Coach. I've seen that bluff-shove tried myself, but I wasn't really thinking of that, it was just a reflex thing.
Deleteone comment on the K-Q, hand to many times it has been my experience that many players are scared to let someone draw. If you are giving him inappropriate odds to draw let him. If he hits his hand so be it. Other wise you are missing value. I think the play was standard except for the river over shove. What did you think would call you other than the queen. Perhaps a bet of 110 might have gotten 2 pair to call.
ReplyDeleteThanks, Anony. As I said in my response above, it wasn't really a thought out play, I guess I was just upset about the fourth straight card.
DeleteMaybe that's why the guy said I should have shoved the turn? Because I shoved the river instead.
D+++ no BOOBIES!!!!!!!!!!!! but u get a + for telling me they have Mtn Dew
ReplyDeleteyeah....I'm thinking I may be overdoing the boobies, there were three pics last time so I figured I'd take a break. People may be getting tired of them.
DeleteBoobies return next time, however.
"ppl may be getting tired of them " WTF???????? Heresy!!!! name names ,sir
DeleteWell you mentioned "donkey" but "action player" sounds so much better!
ReplyDeleteI like that!
DeleteBut I'm so unused to being an "action player" that it feels like being a donkey to me! :)
Normally I start off asking myself: "Is this a hand I want to go to war on?"
DeleteSomewhere between 8 and 9 times out of ten the answer is YES...
IMO,the move was really uncharacteristic of your play, which may or not be a bad thing, as it's good to mix it up a little. But in the long term, this was too much gamble.
ReplyDeleteGL, see you at Colossus!
Big L
Thanks, Big L. I guess the days of me being a full-time nit are over. See you soon.
DeleteFirst hand was waaaaaay too much gamble for me but I've played with plenty of guys and some gals that push all in with that hand and draw. It all depends on your tolerance for variance and how much gamble you got in you. The second hand outside of the push on the river I see no problem with your play. The only way he calls that turn is if he doesn't believe you can beat a pair of 10s. He's certainly not getting the odds to draw for the gutshot. Which means to me he probably calls a bigger value bet on the river if a low card hits the board. He may even reraise the river if another 10 hits.
ReplyDeleteThanks, Neo. In retrospect, I'm kind of shocked myself I risked the $300 that way....I just hope next time I have that much guts, it's a better spot!
Delete