Here’s a midweek cash game session
from my last Vegas trip. The venue was
Caesars, the game was 1/2. This was one
of those tables where the players were changing pretty much constantly. It seemed like, except for my buddy Don, who
joined me mid-game, and no one was at the table longer than 15 minutes. Some went to other games I guess, some just
left the room, but it was a very unstable group. Hard to get a read on anyone when they don’t
stay longer than an orbit or two.
Early on, I limped in with King-Jack
of clubs. Five of us saw a flop of King-Queen-2, two spades, one club. The nice older woman at the table led out for
$15, I called and it was heads up. The
turn was a 10 of spades we both checked.
The river was a blank and she put out $15, I called and she showed
Ace-Queen off. Better to start off
winning a small pot than losing a big one. Great insight, huh?
In the big blind I had pocket
Aces. Some guy had raised to $15. I made it $45. It folded back to the original
raiser who folded instantly.
I had King-4 off in the big blind and
no one raised. It was six-way. The flop
was King-high and I checked/called $10, it was now three-way. The turn was a 4,
also the second spade on the board. I
led out for $20. After a fold, the flop
bettor gave me a good long stare before folding and showing a King face
up. I suppose I could have tried to
check-raise but I wasn’t sure the guy would bet again and two pair is pretty
vulnerable.
In the small blind I completed with
9-8 off. Only three of us saw a flop of
9-8-8. Yahtzee! I checked hoping someone would take a stab at
it. But it checked around. The turn was a 5 and I had to bet. I put out a measly $5 and got one call. The river was a 5. I only bet $10…but didn’t get a call. Shit. What a pathetic pot for such a
monster. What a waste.
This next hand was interesting because
of the weird action on the river. That river action was one of the reasons I
might have missed something recording the action prior to it. I’ll do the best
I can. I had Ace-5 of diamonds in the
big blind. There was a $4 straddle UTG.
I called, the straddler didn’t raise and four or five of us saw the flop, which
was, I think, 4-2-X, one diamond. The “X”: was a biggish card and either the 4
or the 2 was a diamond. No one bet. The turn was the 6 of diamonds and again no
one bet (this part makes no sense if that’s right, as you’ll see). Just as I was thinking that the 3 of diamonds
would give me both a straight and a flush (but not a straight flush), the
dealer actually did put the 3 of diamonds out there. Since the board wasn't paired and I had the
blockers to a straight flush, I had the nuts.
Now as I was trying to figure out how
much to bet, how much would get called, the guy on my immediate left, the
straddler, bet $5 out of turn. The
dealer of course told him that he was acting out of turn and that the action
was on me. Well, knowing the guy had to
bet if I checked, I of course checked.
No point in chasing away business.
So I checked and the guy was obligated
to put out his measly $5. Well, the lady
on his immediate left raised to $10. Oh
wow, this was getting good. Everyone else left folded to me.
And so while I was trying to figure
out what my raise should be, the idiot next to me, who had already bet out of turn
once this street, put another $5 into the pot to call the lady’s raise. Again,
the dealer stopped him and warned him about betting out of turn.
Well, that made it easy for me
again. I knew he didn’t like his hand
enough to re-raise. And I knew since my raising would change the action, he
wouldn’t be obligated to call my raise or even put that extra $5 he had tried
to call with into the pot. I decided on
making it $25, figuring they were both likely to call that—and perhaps the lady
might raise again.
As an aside, I had to consider the
possibility that I suddenly become invisible, since the guy on my immediate
left had twice ignored me. How did he
miss me? Was I actually invisible? Perhaps instead of playing poker that
evening, I should have tested my new super power of invisibility by visiting a
few Ladies locker rooms at gyms around town?
Anyway, both players did indeed call.
No more raises. Still, the river had turned
it into a decent pot. The straddler had
a straight, I don’t remember if he showed his hand or not, but I’m sure that’s
what it was. And the lady showed pocket 6’s for a set. That’s why I find it hard to believe she
didn’t bet the turn. I mean I suppose
she might have been worried about a straight on the turn, but if she was going
to raise (albeit a baby raise) on the river with her 6 out there which made the
straight even more likely, you would think should would have wanted to bet her
set on the turn.
But I think that’s the way it went
down, and I had a nice pot, helped by the guy who didn’t see me. Twice.
The next morning, when I was reviewing
my notes, I got to thinking of a hypothetical where I didn’t know what the correct
answer was.
I’ll ask my readers, perhaps some
dealers or floor people can chime in.
Suppose after the lady made it $10, the straddler, still ignoring my
existence, attempted to make a raise instead of a call? In that case, again, I would then only want
to call the lady’s $10 bet—assuming that is, the guy was obligated to put in
the raise he attempted to do out of turn. Let’s say he tried to make it $25
before I acted. If I knew that he was
obligated to make it $25 if I just called the lady’s bet, it would make sense
for me to just call, knowing he was going to raise. The lady would do whatever she would do and
then I would unleash my raise, with more money in the pot.
But I’m wondering if my calling the
lady’s $10 bet would “change the action” significantly enough so that the
straddler would no long be obligated to put out the raise he tried to make out
of turn. Anyone know? I mean, it’s clear if I had folded, he’d have
to make that raise, but what if I called?
Well, as I said, that’s just
hypothetical, it didn't happen that way.
But I was happy to get what I did in a hand where no one bet the flop or
the turn where I rivered the nuts. And
the guy’s betting out of turn sure helped me out.
I guess one of the reasons I was
unsure about the details of that hand was that I hadn’t had a chance to enter
it into my notes before getting into another hand. I limped in with King-10 of
diamonds. The flop was Ace-high, two
diamonds and yes, the Ace was a diamond, giving me the nut flush draw. It
checked around. An offsuit Jack on the
turn also gave me a gutshot to Broadway.
This time I bet $10 and had one caller.
The river was the Queen of diamonds, once again giving me the nut
flush—in diamonds again—and a straight!
I bet $25 and he hesitated a long time, but finally called. He didn’t show when I tabled my hand. The dealer made a comment about getting two
nut diamond flushes almost back-to-back.
And I pointed out that I also had straights both times.
Don raised to $10 and I called with
Ace-4 of spades, there was one other caller.
The flop was Ace-high and I called Don’s $20 bet, it was heads up. He checked the turn, which was a 4. So I bet $30 and he folded.
In the big blind, I had Ace-4 off and
no one raised. There was no bet on the
flop, which had a 4 on it and some paint cards.
The turn was an Ace, putting three Broadway cards out there. Since it was a limped pot I bet just $5 and
had one caller. I boated up on the river
with another 4. I bet $10 and didn’t get
a call. Second full house of the night where
I won a really dinky pot.
I raised to $10 with pocket Jacks and
it was 4-way. The flop was low and a guy
donked out $10 in front of me. I made it
$30 with my overpair, the donker called and we were heads up. The turn was a blank, my Jacks were still an
overpair and we both checked. The
rivered paired a 6 and he bet again, this time $20. Did he catch that 6? I just called. All he had in his hand was a 4, which matched
one of the flop cards.
That was pretty much it . I booked a nice little profit for the
session, thanks to a couple of diamond flushes and the aura of invisibility.
Unless there is a house rule to the contrary, a call does not constitute a change in action. But house rules are all over the place on how to treat action out of turn.
ReplyDeleteRight you are, sir. In fact, even within a room, I could get different rulings based on who was called over to the table that night.
DeleteNice little session with some big hands and not so big pots, but a win is a win. Oh, nice pics as well. A+
ReplyDeleteGL sir,
Big L
Thanks, Big L. Better to win a small pot than lose a big one, right?
DeleteOf course, just as long as the large-breasted women do NOT turn invisible, u see.
ReplyDeleteI wouldn't want the average-breasted or even modestly-breasted women to turn invisible, either!
Delete