And I’ll be
back in Vegas mid-September, for the next AVP Tournament & Meet-Up (see here).
It’s a $125 tournament with a $20K starting stack at the Aria, so I hope
all of you who can make it do so. Should
be a good one.
My first
night in town, I was reminded that there are people who read my blog and know
me who actually want appear in it. And
are even offended that they haven’t been written about yet.
Case in
point, a fairly new blog reader I’m gonna call “Abe.” I’m hoping that the graphic I’m including in
this post will clue Abe in as to how I came up with his pseudonym.
Abe is one of
the most regular regulars in the poker room and as far as I can tell, he
started reading the blog a few months ago.
I think his intro to my blog may have been the post about Doogie Howser
being a cheap bastard (see here),
based on the fact that he tweeted about that post and had heard the story
himself from the waitress who was stiffed.
We traded
tweets for awhile and then we figured out who were in person. Then one night, while
he was playing at the next table over from where I was, he turned around and
shouted to me, “Hey Rob, I’m reading you latest blog post. It’s hilarious.” So, among other things, Abe has exquisite
taste. I believe the post he was reading
was the Slut Parade post (see here),
and of course, Abe had witnessed the Slut Parade first hand, so he knew how accurate
the post was.
As a direct
result of his good taste, and the fact that he’s a heckuva nice guy, Abe and I
have become pals. Like me, he has also
become pals with many of the dealers in the room.
The last time
I was in town, Abe and I were sitting at the same table and out of the blue, he
said to me, “So Rob, when am I going to get an entry on that spreadsheet of
yours.”
I knew
exactly what he meant. Abe obviously
read my blog carefully enough to know that I actually use an Excel spreadsheet
to keep track of all the pseudonyms I use. It appeared Abe was eager to become
immortalized on this very blog. It was
kind of flattering.
Sitting
between Abe and I was another player who was, I guess, kind of a regular in the
room, at least by the way he was talking to the dealers. I didn’t recognize him. He heard Abe’s question and my response (not
sure if I said, “I dunno” or “we’ll
see”) and asked what he had to do get on my
spreadsheet. He asked this even though
he had, I’m sure, absolutely no idea what Abe was talking about.
So I answered
pretty honestly. “The easiest way is to
either double me up, or stack me.” He
said, “Oh, well I know which one of those I prefer.” In fact, he did neither, and will not be
getting an entry on the spreadsheet. At
least for now.
But Abe is
another matter altogether. Actually, he
was not the first person who had expressed a desire to have a secret identity
on the blog. Recall that Prudence’s pal
Adolf wanted a blog identity even before he had ever read a single blog
post—and didn’t change his mind once he had.
That story is told here,
when I finally came up with the name “Adolf” for him and a story to match.
As I’ve
mentioned recently, I’m still kind of getting used to this (see here).
When I started this blog, I came up with the idea of using fake names to
protect identities. I never imagined
that people would actually want to be blogged about here! Even people who never asked to become “entries
on the spreadsheet” (because, mostly, they had no idea I even had a blog),
never seem to mind when they find themselves “exposed” here. I guess the best example would be Denise, who
I feared would not be happy about the way I first described her. But as I explained here,
she was actually thrilled about the way I “tooted her horn.” She found my seemingly ungentlemanly comments
flattering. And for reasons I can’t
reveal, she is actually very glad that I did blog about her that first time.
Fast forward
to my first night in town this month.
Abe greeted me and expressed dismay that he hadn’t made it into my blog
by now. He was sure that something that
happened late in my last visit would make it into the blog.
Now, since I had
last seen him, I’d posted my most recent story about the woman I call “Didi,”
(see here).
Abe and I don’t see eye-to-eye about her. Most notably, he does not
appreciate her antics the way I do. I
think the phrase he once used was, “I don’t like obnoxious people.” It’s not that Abe is a too-serious guy—he’s
not at all. I’ve seen him laughing it up
at the poker table many a time. He just
isn’t amused by Didi’s brand of outrageousness.
But hey, one man’s obnoxiousness is another man’s blogging fodder.
Every time
Didi showed up in the room, he would express his dismay. Of course, if he actually got stuck at her
table, he could ask for a table change. Near
the end of my last trip, she was in the room and poor Abe got stuck at her table.
As it was
taking too long to get that table change, Abe came over to me, sitting at
another table, and suggested I switch tables with him. Surely I would welcome the opportunity for
more blogging material. But I declined,
as I was quite comfortable at the table I was at.
When I said
no, he reached for his wallet and offered me $20 to switch games with him. I laughed, I wasn’t sure if he was serious,
but there’s no way I would accept money from him to switch seats. He was disappointed. But somehow, Didi herself moved to another
table, and then left.
Still, Abe
complained that his offer of a twenty to get away from Didi didn’t make it into
the blog. I said I was sorry, and tried
to figure out why I hadn’t mentioned it.
I guess the reason is that the day he made that offer hasn’t been
blogged about yet, meaning I hadn’t replayed my voice notes. So when I did the last Didi post, it had
slipped my mind. Sorry Abe. I hope this makes up for it.
Almost as
soon as he saw me, he made a reference that indicated he had picked up on a joke
I had put in a previous post mostly for his benefit. After reading about my bad spell last time
(see here and here),
he offered to lend me a poker book he had that seemed to address some of the
issues I was blogging about. It was Ed
Miller’s “Professional No Limit Hold’em,” and was one of the few Ed Miller
books that wasn’t already in my poker library.
Indeed, he brought it in and lent it to me the very next night.
So in the
post about the Crazy Pineapple tournament I played at Binion’s (see here), I joked about having studied Ed
Miller’s “Professional No Limit Crazy Pineapple”—a book that doesn’t actually
exist. But one of the first things he
said to me this night was to ask me if I had finished reading that very
(non-existent) book.
Not long
after that, Mike, the dealer who starred in this recent post here, saw me for the first time since I had
posted that tale about his birthday poker game.
Somewhat to my surprise, he had read the post and had a bone to pick
with me. Without even saying hi, he
leaned into me and said, “You know, I read your blog. You’re way too sensitive. I wasn’t really mad at you. I was just giving you a hard time. I was kidding.”
I said , “I
knew that, and I was just kidding back.
It was all in good fun.” He said
it didn’t seem like that.
Apparently
Mike doesn’t understand my writing style.
Probably because he’s one of those guys who doesn’t read my blog very
often because—can you believe this?—my posts are “too long.” I know he read the post where I introduced “Adolf”
to the blogosphere because that too was his event, and he was eager to see what
I wrote about it. His main reaction was
disappointment with the name I gave him—“Mike.”
He thought that was king of boring.
I guess it was, as opposed to, well, “Adolf”, and, of course, “Prudence”—whose pseudonym he knew about
before ever reading the blog.
Admittedly, coming up with the name Prudence was perhaps my best bit of
inspiration ever. Sorry Mike. If I ever
have to give you another fake name, I’ll come up with something more
interesting….like “Modell.”
I was just
impressed that Mike had read it. It took
me a long time to get that story posted, many months after the event took
place. He told me once, before it was
posted, that he had looked for it on the blog and hadn’t seen it. I figured he would give up looking through my
too-long posts. But no, it turned out Mike was another person who wanted to
appear on the blog.
Abe agreed
with me that Mike was being too sensitive himself, and so I asked Abe if he had
been the one who had alerted Mike to the story being posted, and he said no. To
his surprise, it was actually Mike who brought it up to him. I teased Mike about being surprised he had
read it since I sometimes use words with more than one syllable. And he said that he might have actually
gotten through that entire post, for a change!
I took a
dinner break at one point and was surprised to see that they had taken out the
restrooms over by the deli. These were
the “poker room restrooms” before they had to move the poker room to make room
for sluttily dressed females. The point
being that I actually felt oddly nostalgic about that Men’s Room, having used
it so many times over the past many years to rid myself of all the Diet Coke
the waitresses were bringing me while I played.
And one of my earliest blog posts took place in that very Men’s Room,
and actually took place long before I started the blog (see here).
I mentioned
this to Brent, who was dealing when I returned to the game. Apparently, the restrooms had closed down
very recently, and he was still going by there out of habit, forgetting they no
longer existed. I thought about
mentioning the fact that I had actually been kissed (by a girl, I assure you) in
that now closed Men’s Room (see the post I just linked to, above) but decided
that might be hard to explain.
So I made an
even bigger faux pas instead. I said, “I
kind of feel sad about it. I mean, I’ve
spent so much time in that Men’s Room.”
That got everyone at the table laughing and I realized it didn’t exactly
come out the way I meant it. Abe said, “And
did the time increase when the hot girls showed up?”
No, no, no…that’s
not what I meant at all. And I didn’t
mean I ever suffered legendary gastric distress in that Men’s Room,
either. “No, you know, one minute at a
time. Just a lot of visits one minute at
a time.” Seriously, that’s what I meant.
One finally
note from this session. While Brent was
dealing, I took out my infamous notebook and started writing some notes about a
hand. Abe, who knew exactly what I was
doing, decided to comment on this. “What
are you doing, Rob? Are you taking notes
about my play? Are you keeping a book on
me so you’ll know what to do against me?”
Brent picked
right up on this. “Yeah, wouldn’t that
be great? You make a bet and then he
says, ‘Excuse me’ and pulls out his notebook, starts paging through it (and he pantomimed
doing this as he spoke) and then finally finds the exact info he needs, and
says, ‘I call.’”
In hindsight,
there wasn’t any actual poker in this session to talk about it, so I won’t. But as it turned out, even if Abe hadn’t
expressed his disappointment about not being an entry in a spreadsheet, he
would have earned his blog name on the very next night anyway, in a session
that we shared. That blog post will have a whole lot of poker. But it will have to wait for another time.
Someday I hope to have my spotlight in the pages of Rob's Vegas and Poker Blog.
ReplyDeleteThanks, TM. But as you'll see when I get to the post I alluded to at the end, you might end up regretting that! Be careful what you wish for.....
DeleteAlthough I mentioned it jokingly on Twitter, as you called me out I have to point out the grammatical error I noticed.
ReplyDelete"Brent picked right up on this. “Yeah, wouldn’t that be great? You make a bet and then he says, ‘Excuse me’ and pulls out his notebook, starts paging through it (and he pantomimed doing this as he spoke) and the finally finds what the exact info needs, and says, ‘I call.’”"
Technically the wording after the parentheses should be "and then finally finds the exact info he needs,...
Oh, and if you do bring me on as a proof-reader, I demand to be paid as a book proof-reader would be paid, as this is what I'm reading....Books!
All joking aside, great post again as usual, sir.
Thanks, Cokeboy.
DeleteI'll give you 10% of all that I make on the blog, so 10% of Zero is....well, you go to school you tell me.
BUT, if you're gonna get all nitpicky, I'll point out that neither of two errors you note are actually grammatical ones, technically.
The first one was an obvious typo "the" should have been "then". As I type, I leave either the Y or the N off those words a lot, and spell check never catches it cuz "the" is a real word.
In the other case, the word "what" is just extraneous, I changed the way I was telling the story and deleted a few words after it, and missed deleting the "what". It's a bad mistake to leave in, but it's not really grammatical.
The trouble with proof reading your own work is that you are so familiar with the material that the mind tends to read it the way you know you meant it and not how it really looks.
u might want to discuss in anteup about the changes at the Palms, how their $1-3 game went to $1-2 to gain more business. Best news in live poker in some time.
ReplyDeleteThanks for the heads up, Tony. I'll check it out.
Delete