Sorry, this post is off topic. No poker, no Vegas, no parking, no boobies.
I just have to vent a little on the
NBA championship series that was decided on Sunday. If you aren't interested in basketball, my apologies
You can skip this and come back in a few days, when I'm sure I'll be talking
about something more in line with my usual subject matter.
But now I must vent. Where better to do that than on my own blog? Of course I've vented a about sports a few
times here before, so this is not a first.
As you know, the Cleveland Cavaliers
won the NBA championship in a thrilling game 7, beating the Golden State
Warriors on the Warriors' home court, becoming the first team in NBA history to
overcome a 3-1 deficit in the finals to win the title. Also, they had to win two of the three games
on the road to do it.
Let me be clear. I am not a Warriors
fan. I was rooting for them against the
Cavs, but the team I live and die for is not the Warriors but the Lakers. But the Lakers have sucked lately, so I
couldn't live and die for them this year.
There have been times when both the Lakers and Warriors had great teams
and they had a pretty intense rivalry, and you can bet I wanted to see the
Warriors buried by the Lakers.
But for now, I was mildly favoring the
Warriors. They are fun to watch and broke
the record for best regular season record in league history, a phenomenal effort.
I am upset not as a Warriors fan, but
as a basketball fan.
And by the way, before the series
started, I tweeted this out: "If I was one of those sports betting degens,
I'd bet on the Cavs to win the series at +180. I think they are 50/50 to win."
No, the point of this post isn't to
brag about being (sorta) right. I did
got some feedback telling me I was crazy and that the Warriors would win
easy. I take no pride in saying it would
be close and that Cleveland was the way to bet.
Sports are unpredictable, that's what makes them so exciting.
It's just that the basketball is my
favorite sport, especially the NBA variety, and I really am pissed about the
way this played out.
To show you how much I love basketball,
I will tell you that I got to Vegas on Thursday, the night of game 6. I delayed poker until after I watched the
entire game in my room. Sunday night, I
was in my room watching the game again, instead of playing poker. Note: I prefer watching a game like this in
my living room (temporary or otherwise) rather than in a poker room, sports
book, or bar. It's just too
distracting. Note: Yes, I've watched
Super Bowls while playing poker, that shows you how much I prefer basketball to
football.
So after the final game, a real
nail-biter that wasn't decided until the final seconds, I tweeted out these two
tweets: "Great game, Cavs &
LeBron earned it....but series is forever asterisked by bonehead NBA front
office decision to change course of series," and "So congrats to the
NBA Front Office for their hard earned NBA Championship."
If you're still reading, I assume you
know what I'm referring to. One of Golden State's key players, Draymond Green was
suspended for game 5, which was the turning point in the series. One of my pals, loyal blog reader (and guest blogger) Nick,
responded, via Twitter, "Huh? Stop it. #conspiracytheories." Nick assumed I was buying into the argument
that the NBA somehow "fixed" the series to add a few more games to
the finals, to make more money and create more excitement. To be clear, I have always thought such
theories are total bullshit. No professional sports league would risk their
reputation, their credibility and even their license to operate by rigging
games like that. That's what we have
professional wrestling for.
No it wasn't the NBA intentionally
fixing the outcome of the series. The
outcome was decided (and changed) by a really boneheaded decision based on an
even more boneheaded rule.
The NBA has two similar rules that I
despise, and that are so moronic I honestly don't understand how anyone with an
IQ above 23 could think they're good ideas.
Once the playoffs starts, players who get above a certain number of
technical fouls, or so-called "flagrant" fouls, will be suspended for
the next playoff game. I'm too lazy and
mostly too irate to look up the number. To me, it is obvious that If a player
hurts his team in a game with a technical foul or a flagrant foul, and possibly
even gets kicked out of that game for it, that penalty itself is more than sufficient. If
it's not, change it and give two free throws for a tech, give four free throws
for a flagrant. The issue needs to be
decided within the game they are playing, not carried over. Put it on the coach to decide if a player who
keeps giving away points with his play or mouth is worth being in the lineup.
But the rules exist and going into
game 4, Green—no less than the second or third best player on the team—was one
flagrant foul away from the magic number where he would have to sit a game.
Late in that game—an easy win for the
Warriors—he got all tangled up with LeBron James, the best player on the Cavs
(and also the best player on the planet, sorry Steph Curry). Basically, James, a very, very strong man,
threw Green (not exactly a lightweight himself) to the ground. And then—in an act that is known in the NBA
as a sign of disrespect—stepped over him.
Green, from his prone position reached out with his hand and made some
extremely minimal contact with James, and appeared to hit him in the groin
area.
The play was reviewed during the
game. The officials are allowed to look
at the replays to decide if any other action needs to be taken, be it a
technical foul, a flagrant foul (of which there are two varieties, one of which
means automatic ejection), or no call.
The officials on the floor did not rule it flagrant foul. The game went
on.
After the game, James whined about it
a bit. The contact was so minimal that
he had no idea where Green "hit" him until a reporter showed him the
play on his cell phone. So James whined
about it some more, making a mountain out of a molehill. I repeat….James didn't know Green hit him (if
he even made contact) in the balls until he saw the replay on a cell phone.
So the next day, the NBA office reviewed
it, and retroactively made Green's "punch" a flagrant foul, earning
Green an automatic suspension for game 5.
They should really have called it a "fragrant foul"—because it
really stinks.
Of course there's some history
here. Green is a tough customer and this
wasn't the first time he'd made contact with a player's family jewels. In the previous series, while completing a
shot, he "accidentally" kicked a player there after getting fouled by
him. The league reviewed that one as
well, and although it could have—and probably should have, based on the moronic
league rules they have—suspended him for the following game in that series,
they did not.
So basically, this was a
"make-up" call by the league.
Those happen all the time in NBA games.
An official realizes he missed a call, and the next time down the court,
he sees a phantom call to make up for it.
This was a "make-up" call.
In the earlier series, the guy Green kicked was not one of the two most
important players on the team. Of
course, LeBron is the league's biggest name, even if Steph Curry has won the
last two MVP awards.
I can't express how reprehensible
this.
It is insane to me that the league
ever, and I mean ever, retroactively overturns a ruling made the officiating
crew at the game. That game is over,
move on to the next. The officials at
the game have the best insight about what happened. They not only saw the game live, they heard
it, the felt it, they understood the dynamics of what lead to it. Plus, as I said, they also have the benefit seeing
it replayed before they make their final decision, just as the idiots in the
league office do.
My feeling here is that if the
officials at the game can't make the right call during the game, fire them and
get better officials. The officials at
the game didn't think it was flagrant, so it wasn't a flagrant foul. Period.
Another thing. In general, I hate with
the intensity of a thousand suns ever suspending a player from a playoff game.
It is brain dead. The playoffs for any
sport is that league's showcase. You
want to have the best players available to play. Period.
As far as I'm concerned, no player (in any sport, really, but the NBA is
the only I care about this much) should "ever" be suspended for a
future game for actions in a previous game.
I put ever in quotes because I suppose if a player took a chair and
smashed it over the back of an official during the game, I might make an
exception. But only then.
No, what they should do, if a player
really does something so egregious that a suspension is warranted, is suspend
the guy for games at the beginning of the next season. I'd rather see a guy
suspended for 20 games to start the next season than for one playoff game when
so much is on line. Suspending players
for a playoff game is not fair to the teammates—and also not far for the fans,
who expect to see the best the league has to offer and who expect that the
games will be decided on the court.
This is not the first time this has
happened. There was a Knicks-Heat series years ago that was changed due to big
brawl, resulting in mass suspensions, that completely changed the course of the
series. More recently, the Suns were
about to defeat the Spurs in a series when their best player was suspended for
a key game due to a strict interpretation of the stupid "leaving the
bench" rule. The Spurs went on to
win that series, and the title, and I always considered that title for the
Spurs to be tainted. And poor Phoenix
was denied their chance to actually win an NBA title.
I hated those decisions then, and I
hate them now. My conclusion is that the
NBA is a beautiful game run by fucking morons.
So in the current series, the
Warriors, at home, lost game 5 without Green.
Green returned for game 6, which was in Cleveland, and the Warriors lost
there too. Worse, one of their players,
Andre Iquodala, hurt his back and was not effective later in the game, and
might have been inhibited in game 7 too,
He was only the MVP in the finals for the Warriors last year. Worst of all, their starting center, Andrew
Bogut, was hurt too, and he was unable to play at all in game 7. He doesn't play a lot of minutes, but his absence
weakened their bench and their rotation and forced them to play Festus Ezeli
for those minutes, who was awful in game 7.
The fact is, the Warriors would have been no worse off if I had played
those minutes instead of Ezeli.
And so…in a really thrilling game that
was a treat to watch, to be sure, the Cavs won on the road. They deserved to win game 7 (and 6), no
question about it. But did they deserve
to win game 5? We'll never really know, will we? The game was decided in New York, not in
Oakland. Game 5 was the pivotal game, the game where the series turn. Did it turn because the Cavs just got that much better--or did it turn because a key player was artificially removed from the game?
It isn't fair to the Warriors, and it
isn't fair to the fans. I don't mean the
Warriors fans, I mean the basketball fans like me who want to see the game
decided by the players.
You know who else it isn't fair
to? The Cleveland Cavaliers. Because the Cavs might very well have won
game 5 even if Green had played—and wouldn't that have been awesome? And then we would have known that they really
earned that victory. And that Cleveland
is truly a deserving champion.
But we don't know that because of some
asshat in the NBA office. Some dipshit
who thinks he's more important than the integrity of the sport, and of the
playoffs. The MVP of the series is not
LeBron James, but Adam Silver (commissioner of the NBA).
I know some of you are saying,
"what about injuries? They can
decide games too." Absolutely. But injuries are part of the game and can't
be helped. In fact, Cleveland had
several major injuries last year when they played the Warriors, so it wasn't a
fair fight. That's why it would have
been so great to see the rematch with both teams at full strength. We almost got to see that, and then the suits
interfered.
Cleveland has it's championship, and
no one can take it away from them. But
for the knowledgeable basketball fans, their victory will always have an
"asterisk." It is a tainted
championship in my eyes.
To sum it up, it is both bad rules and
bad interpretation of those rule that have earned my ire.
Shame on you, NBA, shame on you. And congrats to the NBA league office, the
2016 NBA champions.