Starting hand distribution is weird,
right? You know, if you play an infinite
number of hands of hold'em (which by now, it seems like I have), you should end
up being dealt the proper distribution of starting hands. I mean, you'll be dealt pocket Aces just as
often as pocket deuces, and you'll get Ace-King off just as often as you'll get
7-deuce off. But in the short run, it
seems like you are seeing the same bad hands over and over and hardly ever get
to see the same good hands. You have
sessions where it seems like there must be extra 8's and 4's in the deck
because you see 8-4 over and over again.
Every now and then you run well, and get to see some premium starting
hands more often than you should. Very
rare, but it happens.
Saturday I was dealt exactly five
pocket pairs, but I got two of the pocket pairs twice each, and in order.
It was 2/3 in Ventura, and I bought in
for the $300 max. I was still waiting for
my first hand to play when I looked down at King-Queen off in the big blind, by
far the best hand I'd seen this day.
There was a raise to $16 and a call.
I decided to call as well, because, well, position. The flop was King-Jack-X, and when it checked
to me, I bet $25 and took it down. This
was quite a victory. The previous week,
I was so card dead (didn't both writing a post about the session) that I won
only one pot—a big blind hand where no one raised, no one bet until I bet a
back door straight I completed on the river and didn't get a call. It was a $6 pot.
I got my first pocket pair of the day,
7's. I called a reasonable raise, it was
multi-way, and the flop came King-Queen-Jack.
Not exactly a great flop for my 7's.
I folded as fast as it was legal to do so.
My next pocket pair—also my next
playable hand—was Jacks. I believe I called a raise over a straddle, and pretty
much was done when the flop came Ace-King-x. There were four players in the
hand, and there was already a bet and a call when it came to me.
It was a long time before getting another
hand to play. Finally, I got two Jacks
again. Sweet. I mean how many times do we finish a session
complaining about not getting dealt pocket Jacks enough? I opened to $15 and only had one caller. The flop was Ace-Queen-x, two diamonds. I did not have the Jack of diamonds. Nevertheless, I decided to take a shot with a
c-bet. I put out $20 and after a long
tank, my opponent folded.
Another long spell of getting
nothing. Then I finally not another
pocket pair, this time one better than Jacks—Queens. There were a couple of limpers and from the
cut-off I made it $18. I got three
callers. The flop was Jack-high, two
diamonds. I didn't have the Queen of
diamonds. I bet $50 and after a couple
of quick folds, the last player tanked for a long time. But he too folded.
Then after a bit, those ladies
returned to me. I was under-the-gun and
made it $15. Two players called, than a
short stack shoved his last $55. I
strongly considered raising to get it down to heads up and get any weak Aces to
fold. I suppose that was the right
play. But I decided to just call. One of the two remaining players also called.
The flop was Jack-5-5. I liked that flop
and bet $100. The other guy folded. Too bad.
The turn was a Queen. The river
was a brick. The all-in guy said,
"I have a Jack," and showed Jack-10.
I said, "I have a boat," and took in a decent pot.
No more pairs, no more playable hands
came my way. I left booking a $105
win. It was just weird that the pairs included
Jacks twice and Queens twice, and all the pairs came to me in rank order when
you think of it.
For once, the ladies were good to me.
I won a bad beat jackpot with QQ. I should start a blog and write about it because I almost folded them. It was getting late in a very bad day.
ReplyDeleteFolding pocket Queens? Wow. Glad you didn't Nice save.
Deletei expected a much different type of blog post from the title. and i made a horrible fold with qq earlier today on a flop of 772 10 on the turn.
ReplyDeleteGlad I fooled you with the title. Never fold QQ, Tony. Only KK.
DeleteSpace x just launch a rocket . It might land on Mars soon.
ReplyDeleteThanks for that interesting bit of news, Sethanon.
DeleteBut I think you posted this to the wrong post!