After the post here,
I had two more sessions at the Bike, attempting to use the same strategy. I won
a little during the first one and lost a little during the second one. The poker was unexceptional and not worth
blogging about.
The trouble was, I was incredibly card
dead. In fact, during the four sessions,
totaling almost 18 hours of play, I was never once dealt pocket Aces, pocket
Kings or pocket Jacks. Not a single
time. I had pocket Queens twice during that time—in the same session. I’m sure that law of averages would dictate
that I get a premium pair a lot more than twice in 18 hours of poker.
And in trying to follow the Ed Miller
strategy I was learning, I had a fairly tight range of starting hands, so I
just didn’t play a lot of hands. Now
that I think of it, however, his strategy was centered around play in early and
middle position, I probably could have opened up the range a bit in late
position, and I didn’t do that. So next
time I will remember that I can play more hands on the button.
Anyway, during one of the sessions I
did learn about a hand that I think is worth mentioning, even tho I didn’t see
it.
When I got to the table, at around
Noon, there was a kid there with probably more chips than I’d ever seen anyone
ever have at a low-stakes ($2/$3) game. It
looked like close to $2,000, give-or-take.
He was a young guy who I didn’t recognize wearing a baseball cap (the
proper way), no headphones, earbuds, sunglasses or hoodie. I observed his play right away, and he was
not at all aggressive, he sure wasn’t taking advantage of his monster stack to
bully the table.
The max buy-in is $300, so I asked the
guy to my right, who looked an awful lot like long-time blog reader CoolDave88, (see here),
if he knew how the guy had gotten all those chips. He said that he had won a
$1,200, three-way pot and never looked back.
Then he described the hand. It was all-in preflop. The kid had pocket
Aces. The other two players both
had the dreaded pocket Kings. And boy, were they ever dreaded that
time! And sadly, the guy telling me the
story was one of the poor saps with the cowboys. Ouch.
A crazy variation to the ol’ Aces vs.
Kings hand I’ve mentioned a few times before (see here),
huh? The two guys with the Kings were
drawing nearly dead, and of course the kid with the Aces was a very happy
camper. The most amazing part of the
story was that, with my luck with the dreaded hand, I wasn’t one of the guys
with Kings. The fact that I hadn’t
arrived at the Bike yet might have had something to do with it.
Anyway, I was there less than half an
hour when the kid racked up and took his chips with him. It was a bit over $1,900. I asked him how long he had been
playing. He said he arrived at the Bike
at around 5AM. Five AM? My goodness, I can’t imagine any
circumstances that would find me at the Bike playing poker at 5AM. Maybe that’s why I don’t win $1,600 playing
poker.
I couldn’t get Aces or Kings dealt to
me in 18 hours of poker, but in that one hand, three guys had them! But I’m pretty happy that I wasn’t one of the
guys with the Kings there, at least.
greatest blog post EVER!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! u r smart as fornication
ReplyDeleteThanks, anger, glad to hear from you again, since you hadn't commented on the last few recent posts, I was afraid you were abandoning me for some site that mad MORE gratuitous pics of cleavage.
DeleteBut sir.....remember the words of a famous blogger, I'm actually dumb as fornication!
i wouldnt leave just busy with fantasy,weed,FWB,freerolls,and taco bell. u know important sheeeeeeeeit
DeleteDrawing dead. Ah, the memories. One of my favorite hands EVAR was this one at South Point, in which I had just my unimproved overpair to the flop, yet had two opponents drawing completely dead, with all three of us all in.
ReplyDeletehttp://pokergrump.blogspot.com/2007/12/once-in-while-game-just-plays-itself.html
(The second story in that post.)
Thanks Grump, that was another fun post of yours. And very rare to have two opponents drawing dead on the flop with you having just an overpair. Can you teach me how to do that?
DeleteI do have a question for you....in that post, and in others, you indicate that you buy in to a 1/2 game for $100 usually. I'm curious as to why. Most good players would buy into a 1/2 game for $200 minimum (100 big blinds). Why do you prefer only 50 big blinds?
I really thought you had my entire blog archives memorized by now. I am so disappointed to learn that you don't. If you did, you would know of the post in which I described shifting from a habitual $100 buy-in to a usual $300 buy-in, and how and why that change was happening: http://pokergrump.blogspot.com/2009/07/buying-in-big.html
DeleteNow that I'm rereading that, I think it might make a good subject for my next PokerNews strategy article--buying in big versus small.
You have no idea how relevant your comment is.
DeleteA week or two back, I found myself confined to bed due to a recurring of my chronic weak back issues. I got bored with the book I was reading and then I remembered you making a similar comment before.
So I decided that going through your archives would not only be fun, but it would probably be more +EV than reading any random poker strategy book.
So, with my trusty Android tablet, I started going thru the Grump archives. I insisted on starting at the very beginning and reading them in order.
I have found it fascinating in so many ways, highly entertaining and educational. Sadly, reading a Blogger blog in order from the beginning on a tablet is not that user-friendly, but I am working my way thru it.
But you know, some of your posts were long. Have you ever heard that complaint? I think I found some that make my average post look like tweets. Anyway, I am having fun working my way thru it, and in fact, I am seriously considering doing a post about this journey thru your blog I am taking.
Since I started at the beginning, I hadn't gotten to the post you linked (or the earlier one you linked in that post), but of course they were great. Thanks for the link.
Now, if I have given you an idea for a Poker News article, I of course expect my share of the royalties.
Yeah, I have occasionally been surprised at how long I droned on in some old posts when I've gone back to reread them. But I'm glad you're enjoying the trip down my memory lane!
ReplyDelete