The Saturday before Christmas I headed
to Aria to play in the $240 Big Blind Ante tournament. I documented my initial reaction to that
tournament here. By the way, the big blind ante format is
catching on and will likely be coming to a poker room near you soon. Wynn tried it out for their Signature Weekend
just recently, and will be using it for most of the events at their Winter
Classic next month. The Venetian is
trying it out in some of their DSE events coming up. And here in L.A., Matt Savage has been trying
it out in some of the events at the current L.A. Poker Classic. I'm pretty sure it's here to stay.
One thing I don't like about $240 on
the weekends at Aria is the starting time, 11AM is just too early for me. I had to pack a lunch and eat it on the first
break, which is a pain. But after seeing
how good the structure of the tournament is, I decided that I could get there
closer to Noonish and still get more than enough play. That way I could eat lunch before getting to
the Aria, much better for my meds schedule
So for my return, I arrived
fashionably late—around 11:50, so about half-way through the second level. And
wouldn't you know it, they had just filled the 30th seat so I was the first
alternate. Having to wait once I got
there was making me question my thinking that it would be ok to arrive
late. However, the TD assured me that
once they got a few more alternates they'd open another table. Sure enough, just a few minutes later they
opened a fourth table, using the alternates and also taking a player or two
from each existing table I received my
first hand with just 4 minutes gone in the third level so it wasn't so bad.
Unfortunately, I didn't have any
success in the tourney. I didn't last
very long and there were not a lot of interesting hands to talk about. I know that doesn't always stop me from
talking about them anyway, but this time it will.
I just want to focus on one amusing
situation that occurred when I was getting short stacked but still had enough
chips to actually play with—I wasn't quite down to fold-or-shove territory but
I was in a position where I had no choice but to take a little bit of risk to
try to get my stack up to a respectable level.
So on the button I had Ace-6 off and
it folded to me. The blinds for this level were 300/600 with a single ante of
400. I decided it was a good spot to
steal so I made it $1500. Now the small
blind was the big stack at the table.
But he hadn't been overly aggressive.
This time he started fumbling with his chips, but before he acted, the
big blind, oblivious to the fact that the guy on his right hadn't acted,
suddenly pushed out all his chips. He
was a short stack. His bet was a few
times my bet I guess but a fair amount less than I had.
The dealer spoke up immediately,
"No, no, no…he hasn't acted yet," pointing to the small blind. Then to the small blind, she said, "You
didn't see that."
But the small blind knew exactly what
that meant. "If I just call, his
bet stands, right?" I don't believe
the dealer answered but it didn't matter.
The small blind said, "I call."
The big blind pushed all his chips
back out. I dunno if the thought
occurred to him to try to not shove at that point. I don't know if he realized how screwed he
likely was. But he didn't ask the dealer if he had to go all-in. He might have at least asked to see if he
could get a friendly ruling. Maybe he figured his hand was good enough to shove
with no matter what. But I knew exactly
what the small blind's comment meant.
The action was back on me and I said
to the small blind, "I think that's a tell." Everyone at the table laughed. Now, the small blind probably shoved too many
chips for me to have seriously considering calling if it was just heads
up. But the small blind's comment made
it crystal clear that he wanted to raise my initial bet, but knowing the guy
would be obligated to shove if he just called, just called. So he had really caught a break with the guy
betting out of turn. There was no way I
was messing with the big stack with a lousy Ace-6 knowing if I called the big
stack would put me all in. So after
making my joke, I folded.
Of course the small blind called the
big blind's shove and showed Ace-King.
The big blind showed Ace-9. He
didn't improve and he was gone. I assume
that if he had been paying attention and waited for the small blind to raise
me, he would have folded. Oh well,
that's what you get for not paying attention, right?
I busted out a few hands later. I had to shove with 8-7 of clubs when I had a
chance to open the pot. Unfortunately
the big blind (a big stack) decided to call with pocket 6's. I whiffed and was done.
One thing I want to mention about this
big blind ante format is, you have to be aware of who is overly defending their
big blind because they also post a big ante.
Here's what I mean. It's pretty
standard in a tournament to open a pot to ~2.5x the big blind, especially early
in the tournament. Sure you see all kinds
of opens but that's more or less what the good players do unless they have good
reason to change it up. I think that's
come down in recent years, it was probably 3X a few years back.
The big blind is typically the player
who will most likely call a raise like that since he already has an investment
in the pot. So he has to decide if his
hand is worth risking an additional 1.5 blinds to make the call. But, with this format, instead of posting a
relatively small ante, he or she actually had to post an ante that was pretty
close to the size of the big blind. With
that extra investment, is that BB more likely to defend? Really, they shouldn't be….they have to come
up with the same amount of chips as in the old method to make the call. But psychologically, will that bigger ante
they posted make them more committed to the pot?
It will vary from player to player so
you have to pay attention and see if it appears they are defending the big
blind too often.
I do enjoy the big blind format, and
I'm sure I'll enjoy it more once I cash in one in a tournament using it.
The big blind paying all the antes shouldn't effect the decision to defend your BB. But... in certain cases I could see where it would be taken into consideration. It is interesting to hear this BB/ante consolidation is getting traction in other LV venues!
ReplyDeleteIt's getting traction all over the country. MGM in DC used it, others too. Forgot to mention that the WSOP is using it in some events this year!
DeleteI think it might affect people psychologically even if it's not correct math wise. The single angle is typically the amount of the bb, so that min raise is so close to what they already have invested. I'll have to play it more to see if that is the case.
u meant to type the small blind had ak and the other guy had a9. instead if u reread ur post u will see u typed the small blind had both hands.
DeleteThanks, Tony. I fixed it.
Delete